powered by FreeFind                                                      Got a tip or other information? Contact Peter & Karen

Updated July 2, 2008

I've been investigating medical fraud and quackery for 25 years. Peter Heimlich and his wife Karen uncovered the biggest case I've ever seen - Robert S. Baratz MD PhD DDS, National Council Against Health Fraud (From What medical & water safety experts say about Peter & Karen's work)

Why have I spoken out? Shouldn't the question be, why hasn't the medical profession spoken out more forcefully? (Peter M.Heimlich, Minn. Star-Tribune, January 1, 2007)

The most challenging and personal question in our story is one which most people face in one form or another: When confronted with wrongdoing committed by a family member, how do we choose to respond? - PMH


Click the photo to read the Radar Magazine story about how Karen & Peter exposed the remarkable 50-year history of fraud surrounding Peter's father

To jump to the main section of our site, click here.

REPORTERS & BLOGGERS: Please check out these 5 unreported or under-reported important stories.

1) What's the best way to rescue a choking victim? That depends on whom you ask....

2) "These so-called medical experts. Screw 'em."

So says the president of NASCO, a Houston-area company which teaches lifeguards all over the US to perform the Heimlich maneuver on drowning victims. Every first aid organization and drowning expert says it's a useless, dangerous treatment. Over the years, its use on drowning victims has been associated with dozens of poor outcome cases, mostly kids.

3) A "so-called medical expert," 30 poor outcome cases, and six dead kids.

4) Blood on their hands? Why is a $250 million/year Cincinnati hospital corporation promoting the Heimlich maneuver for drowning rescue?

5) What connects an Episcopal Archbishop, a current US congressional race, HIV+ sex workers, African gold mines, two senior editors at The New Republic, my father, my father's attorney, and my brother the Christian radio talk show host?

They're all part of the illicit human experiments conducted by Cincinnati's Heimlich Institute. Then there's the matter of $9 million....

 



What's the best way to rescue a choking victim? That depends on whom you ask.
And why is the Red Cross failing to inform the public of their 2006 choking rescue guidelines update?
And why is the current US Surgeon General choking on "the Koop maneuver"?

THE AMERICAN RED CROSS (ARC): Few people are aware that in 2006, the ARC made the first major change in choking rescue in 20 years. The Heimlich maneuver is no longer recommended as the first treatment response. The ARC now recommends first performing five back blows; if that doesn't remove the obstruction, proceed with five abdominal thrusts. (The ARC no longer uses the term "Heimlich maneuver.")

THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION (AHA): The AHA says they don't know which treatment is best - back blows, chest thrusts, or abdominal thrusts - but they recommend only abdominal thrusts even though their guidelines state that the treatment may result in "life threatening complications." (Columbus Dispatch, 11/5/06)

Meanwhile, Australia has eliminated the Heimlich maneuver and replaced it with chest thrusts.

Presumably the public's entitled to the best available first aid training, so which treatment is best and why?

###

In this widely-reported June 10, 2008 Fox News story, former Presidential candidate Mike Huckabee described his first reaction upon seeing a choking colleague at a Greensboro, NC political event:

"I just happened to look up and I saw somebody patting on the back...I knew that the worst thing you can do is pat someone on the back if they're choking," Huckabee said, noting that he had taken emergency medical training when he was younger. (Fox News video via YouTube)

Why isn't a well-informed public figure like Mr. Huckabee aware that since Spring 2006, both the Red Cross and Heart Association now recommend backslaps for choking rescue?* In my opinion, it's not his fault. The first aid organizations are simply failing to inform the public about this potentially lifesaving information. I can prove it.

First, imagine your kid is choking. Now go visit the Red Cross's website and see how long it takes you to find their choking rescue first aid instructions. Good luck.

This is the first major update in US choking rescue in 20 years, one which requires re-training the public, news posters, etc. That story has been reported in dozens of print & TV reports around the country since 2006. For a comprehensive list, click here.

If you assume the communications departments of the Red Cross and Heart Association are responsible for these stories, you'd be wrong. I'm responsible for generating virtually all of them. The list is alphabetized by state. Check your own state and see how few news outlets have reported the story - you may be surprised.

In other words, the only way for the public to learn about the Red Cross's current choking rescue guidelines is either by locating one of the stories yours truly has gotten reported or by taking a Red Cross class. Given these circumstances, cynics might even conclude that the Red Cross has chosen to only provide this potentially lifesaving information to those who pay for their training.

*Ironically, per this June 19, 2008 Arkansas Times item, the American Red Cross "happens to be the employer of Janet Huckabee, the ex-governor's wife." Like her husband, if Mrs. Huck was unaware of the new guidelines, I wouldn't be surprised. Considering their organization's various problems - such as the 2007 sex scandal - who knows if their own executive staff is being properly trained in first aid?

###

Why so much confusion and apparent incompetence by the first aid organizations? And where did the idea that backslaps are dangerous come from?

Facts prove much of the responsibility falls squarely into the laps of two American medical icons and longtime personal friends. In 1985, my father ("America's most famous doctor" according to The New Republic), and former US Surgeon General C. Everett Koop, ("America's family doctor" according to himself), scammed the American Red Cross, the American Heart Association, and the American public in order to promote the Heimlich maneuver over other choking rescue methods as "a buddy favor," as I told syndicated columnist Lenore Skenazy.

As for Dr. Koop, he dodges every reporters who tries to ask him about this. Meanwhile, current US Surgeon General Steven K. Galson won't even answer my straightforward questions. Why is Dr. Galson protecting misconduct by his predecessor? And how does this hide & seek by the US Surgeon General's office benefit the American public?

For more on the "Koop maneuver," click any of these photos:

        

 

 


"These so-called medical experts. Screw 'em."

  
John Hunsucker PhD & Henry Heimlich MD                                                       photo source

Even after being tagged in this October 2007 Houston Press cover story, a Houston-area company continues to train lifeguards at "most of the major waterparks" around the US to perform the Heimlich maneuver on drowning victims, a treatment which has been universally discredited as useless and potentially deadly by the American Red Cross (source), the American Heart Association (source), the National Academy of Sciences (source), an international association of lifeguards (source), and every other legitimate drowning and water safety expert.

Here's what John Hunsucker, president of the lifeguard training company and a University of Houston professor told the Houston Press: "These so-called medical experts. Screw 'em."

###

B. Chris Brewster, International Life Saving Federation:

My greatest concern, however, is that while Hunsucker's article addresses the ineffectiveness of resuscitation, he and his company, National Aquatic Safety Co. (NASCO), continue to advocate use of the Heimlich maneuver for drowning. In this, they appear to stand alone because it has long been rejected by international consensus of the national resuscitation councils of the world. In one article on the matter, while he acknowledged that his Ph.D. is in engineering he medically deconstructed arguments on the maneuver and ultimately endorsed it quipping, "I'm a hugger and don't kiss unless I have to." Hunsucker appropriately worries over the psychological impact on guards who unsuccessfully attempt resuscitation, but what if that failure is the result of following his and his company's improper guidelines? (Aquatics International, July/August 2007)

 


 A "so-called medical expert," 30 poor outcome cases, and six dead kids

Dayton Daily News, September 1, 2006: Dr. James Orlowski has collected about 30 cases of Heimlich maneuvers leading to bad results in drowning rescues, usually because of vomiting. Orlowski, a prolific researcher, directs pediatric intensive care, pediatrics and medical ethics at University Community Hospital in Tampa and teaches at the University of South Florida. He wrote 19 years ago in The Journal of the American Medical Association about what should have been the "routine resuscitation" of a 10-year-old boy who'd been submerged for less than two minutes. But given the Heimlich maneuver, the boy vomited extensively, damaging his lungs and impeding a lifeguard's and doctor's efforts to give him CPR. The boy died after seven years in a coma.

  
Marquis Fuller (center)                                        Angela Henley                                             Danny Blanco        

Marquis Fuller (8 years old), St. Augustine, FL, 2004
Derrick Kelly (17 years old), Detroit, 2003
Danny Blanco (2-1/2 years old), Orland Park, IL, 2001
Unnamed girl (3 years old), Orlando, FL, 1997
Unnamed boy (10 years old), Cleveland, OH, approx. 1979

Angela Henley (18 years old), Kirksvile, MO, in:
To Heimlich of Not?, Part II, KTVO (ABC)

5/23/08, Goshen, IN: 10 year-old near-drowning victim in critical condition after lifeguard performs Heimlich maneuver

 

 Blood on their hands?

Deaconess Associations, the $250 million/year Cincinnati hospital and health services corporation which wholly owns the Heimlich Institute, also says "screw the medical experts." Since 1998, Deaconess has been promoting the use of the Heimlich maneuver for drowning rescue. It's all over their website.

Are medical staff in the Deaconess Hospital ER trained to do the Heimlich on drowning victims? Of course not; they'd be sued for providing substandard care. But Deaconess has no problem promoting the information via the Heimlich Institute's website. The other sick joke? Since March 2005, the Heimlich Institute has been shuttered and has no employees, as reported in this November 17, 2006 ABC Chicago I-Team report. It's nothing but a website, fundraising on non-existent projects and planning to promote the Heimlich maneuver for drowning "in perpetuity" (source).

Further, in order to promote his crackpot drowning claims, my father published bogus case reports in peer-reviewed medical journals. When asked by physicians and others to substantiate these cases, my father and Deaconess come up empty.

How many more kids will be injured or killed before Deaconess stops this madness? When will the media confront the board members of the Heimlich Institute, some of Cincinnati's most prominent citizens, and demand an explanation? For years, I've repeatedly brought this story to the attention of every broadcast and print news outlet in Cincinnati, all of whom refuse to report it. (Documentation on request.) Why are they protecting these Queen City big shots who are putting children's lives at risk?

Henry J. Heimlich MD, trustee
Philip M. Heimlich, vice president (former public official turned radio talk show host)
Barbara Lohr
, secretary (Director of Corporate Marketing & Communications, Deaconess Associations)
E. Anthony Woods, chairman (also Chairman of Deaconess Associations and SupportSource; board member LCA-Vision, Cincinnati Financial Corporation, and Phoenix Health Systems)
Jane Mary Tenhover, trustee (Executive Director, Deaconess Health Associations Fund; vice president of development, St. Elizabeth Medical Center; has worked in fund-raising for American Guild of English Handbell Ringers, Sisters of Charity, Cincinnati Museum Center and the University Of Cincinnati College Conservatory of Music.

            
           Woods                             Tenhover                                               Phil Heimlich

 

 

One of these people is now running for an Ohio Congressional seat.
One of them dropped out of the same race.

Two of them are senior editors at The New Republic.
One is married to a New Republic editor.

What's their connection to illicit AIDS experiments on African prostitutes and $9 million?

To find out, click on any pic.
   
       

 

 


 

 

         
          Washington Post, 10/10/89                                                                                                       The HJ Heimlich Award for Innovative Medicine

Outmaneuvered: How We Busted the Heimlich Medical Frauds
by Peter M. Heimlich

What's this website about?
Medical experts speak out against my father's history of misconduct
What medical & water safety experts say about Peter & Karen's work
ABC-TV investigative reports
Key news stories & documents by subject

What's this website about?

Why have I spoken out? Shouldn't the question be, why hasn't the medical profession spoken out more forcefully? (Minn. Star-Tribune, January 1, 2007)

I violated the real cardinal rule in my family. I told the truth
(ABC 20/20, 6/8/07)

In Spring 2002, my wife Karen and I began researching the career of my father, Henry J. Heimlich MD of Cincinnati, famous for the Heimlich maneuver choking rescue method. Despite his celebrity - my father has been the subject of hundreds of TV and print stories - until we came along no one had ever done a thorough review of the man and his work.

To our astonishment, we inadvertently uncovered a wide-ranging, unseen 50-year history of fraud. Our research revealed my father to be a spectacular con man, undoubtedly one of history's most prolific - and destructive - medical humbugs. Armed with considerable charm, an instinct for public relations, and fueled by a ravenous need for attention and adulation, he used the media to pass himself off as a medical genius/inventor and humanitarian, eventually being crowned "America's most famous doctor" (The New Republic).

Our close examination of the facts revealed a parallel unseen history. For five decades, virtually uncriticized and unchecked, my father perpetrated a mind-boggling array of unethical and often illegal activities. Remarkably, he did so almost entirely in plain sight and in full view of his peers and the press. What resulted was the manipulation and corruption of the medical profession, his closest associates, and even some members of his own family.

First, it's unlikely my father even invented what came to be known as the Heimlich maneuver. At this writing, it appears likely he appropriated the idea from a colleague. If so, it wouldn't be the first time, as described in this front page Cincinnati Enquirer article, Heimlich Falsely Claims He Invented Surgical Procedure.

Regardless of who first came up with the idea - that an abdominal thrust can stimulate an articial cough and thereby help expel a foreign body airway obstruction - there's no question the procedure is an effective means of rescuing a choking victim. However, since my father introduced the Heimlich maneuver in 1974, there's been on ongoing debate as to whether it's the most effective, safest treatment. (My father also used a variety of dirty tricks to gain acceptance for the maneuver over other, perhaps better methods. Click here for more information.)

In any event, establishing the identity of who first conceived of the idea that an abdominal thrust may help dislodge a foreign body airway obstruction is certainly of interest, especially if "the Heimlich maneuver" wasn't the brainchild of Dr. Heimlich. But that's only a minor detail in a much more significant story, one which raises troubling, ongoing questions about the responsibility of the medical profession and the media; about why we come to believe what we believe; and about how individuals and organizations respond when a spectacular history of chicanery is exposed.

Facts prove that for 30 years, my father made up a string of crackpot medical treatments which he then relentlessly promoted by any means, including the fabrication of data and case reports. Based on his reputation for inventing a choking rescue treatment, the media enthusiastically and unquestioningly provided him with a platform to circulate these useless, potentially deadly quack treatments and to profit by fundraising on promises of "miracle cures." (Trained as a chest surgeon, my father stopped practicing medicine in 1976, when he was fired by Jewish Hospital of Cincinnati. Among other issues, he had a history of repeatedly fainting in the O.R. and on at least one occasion he walked out on a patient in mid-surgery.)

These "treatments" include the use of the Heimlich maneuver for drowning rescue, to stop asthma attacks, and to cure cystic fibrosis, theories which appear to be the result of delusional thinking. Then there's my father's weirdest, most audacious scam: "malariotherapy." Over three decades he has claimed that AIDS, cancer, and Lyme disease may be cured by infecting patients with malaria. During those years the nonprofit Heimlich Institute has funded and organize clandestine offshore human experiments on both American and Third World patients. Medical experts have compared this unsupervised, exploitative "research" to the notorious Tuskegee syphilis experiments and Nazi concentration camp atrocities. (Coincidentally, my father, who has no training or expertise in immunology, bases his theory on the work an early 20th century psychiatrist, Julius Wagner Von Jauregg, who became a Nazi eugencist.)


Von Jauregg

My father's promotion of the Heimlich maneuver for drowning is equally horrifying. Our research uncovered that for 30 years he engineered what may be one of medical history's most diabolical and calamitous schemes. In order to "jump start" his idea, beginning in 1974, my father cooked up a string of phony cases in which drowning victims were allegedly rescued using the maneuver. Cronies - including several medical professionals - helped fake the cases. My father then used his media access to encourage the public to do the Heimlich maneuver on drowning victims. Recently two physicians wrote to my father and asked him to produce any substantive evidence to support his own case reports - he has none.

Meanwhile, every first aid organization and drowning expert warns that my father doesn't know anything about drowning and that doing the maneuver on drowning victims not only wastes precious rescue time, but may cause victims to vomit and aspirate. But people trusted the famous Dr. Heimlich and many followed his advice. The result of this folly? Dozens of documented serious injuries and deaths, including kids.

In other words, my father and his cronies faked cases in order to promote a useless treatment which, when put into practice, were a proximate cause of the deaths of who knows how many people. What else can this be called but an atrocity?

When we uncovered the frauds, Karen and I realized that my father and others who promoted his sick theories were a menace. We had the choice to cross our fingers and hope no one else got hurt or killed, or we could do what we could to expose this madness.

First we filed thoroughly-documented complaints with a variety of medical oversight organizations, requesting that they investigate the frauds. Most refused to take action, so we took our information to the media. Since Spring 2003, when the Cincinnati Enquirer published two Sunday front page exposes, our research has been the basis for dozens of other print and TV reports (NY Times, LA Times, Reuters, etc.) Four have won journalism awards. Click here for links to some of those stories.

Despite this exposure, Deaconess Associations of Cincinnati and a handful of other organizations continue to promote my father's crackpot theories. Lucky for Deaconess, after the 2003 exposes, Enquirer editor Tom Callinan pulled the plug. In fact, while reporters all over the country have been reporting dozens of stories based on our research, mainstream media in the Queen City plays ostrich - they simply refuse to report critical stories about my father or my brother Phil Heimlich, a former local elected official.

Back to table of contents


Phil Heimlich at a Topeka, Kansas "Prayer Breakfast," describing how he had a religious epiphany "in 1981 at a Bob's Big Boy restaurant, where he accepted Christ as his savior" - (Topeka Capital-Journal, 11/15/03)

Who is my brother Phil? Until being knocked out of power in a November 2006 anti-corruption vote, during his 12 years as a local public official, Phil made his name on an anti-gay rights, anti-choice, anti-pornography, free market, "traditional family values" platform. Our family may be many things, but traditional we're not. For example, Phil claims he became a born-again Christian after having a religious epiphany at a Big Boy hamburger restaurant. See Republican Phil Heimlich: Hold The Mayo, I Just Found Jesus by Bill Sloat, The Daily Bellwether, 12/2/07. In May 2008, my brother began hosting a "conservative Christian" syndicated radio talk show:


Click logo to visit www.heimlichhardtruths.com

As the longtime vice president of the Heimlich Institute, Phil's also up to his neck in my father's medical frauds. According to a Cincinnati Enquirer reporter, the Heimlich Institute received $9 million in undeclared funding from gold mining companies to fund "Malariotherapy clinics" on African gold estates in which HIV+ African mine workers would be deliberately infected with malaria. The Heimlich Institute at Deaconess had already funded and supervised similar "research" in China. With a work force ravaged by AIDS, Africa's mining industry offered a bigger, more lucrative opportunity for exploitation, with even less oversight.

Hiding behind a Teflon media reputation, my father used to be able to get away with all sorts of crooked schemes. But in 2003, he encountered an unanticipated problem - me. Critical stories based on our research started appearing on the front page of the Cincinnati Enquirer and other stories followed in which I spoke out against my father's frauds. That scrutiny might eventually lead to the $9 million being exposed. If so, my father and brother might be up to their necks in a variety of problems, including tax fraud.

What happened next wasn't pretty. My father, my brother Phil, my sister Janet Heimlich, Cincinnati press agent Robert Kraft and a couple of other creeps engaged in a "smear Peter" campaign. In an attempt to ruin my credibility, they began making false and defamatory statements to reporters and to others, claiming that I had "a history of mental problems" and other lies.

Their response will be recognizable to those familiar with the dynamics of families who may be sitting on a Pandora's Box of dark secrets, especially prominent, high-profile families whose reputation and status would be affected if serious wrongdoing and/or embarassing problems might be brought to light. Hypothetically speaking, some examples might be professional misconduct, narcotics dealing and/or abuse, sexual misconduct, untreated eating disorders, etc.

click photos for more information
                       

In order to avoid such disclosures, family members may "circle the wagons" and attack the source. As I told Brain Ross on ABC 20/20, "I violated the real cardinal rule in my family. I told the truth." By speaking out against the medical frauds, that might lead to the exposure of any number of professional and personal secrets, so they needed to silence me. Those attempts ranged from letters to the editor written by my siblings to enlisting a corrupt writer who cooked up a hit piece for a national magazine designed to make me appear off-kilter and unhinged.

Finally, after a few years of being unjustly slimed by my family and a few of their cronies, I contacted attorney H. Louis Sirkin, who agreed to represent me. Sirkin's a well-known First Amendment lawyer known for defending free speech, including the Robert Mapplethorpe exhibit at Cincinnati's Contemporary Arts Center. He and his colleague Jennifer Kinsley took on my father, Kraft, Phil, and others. Here are some of the cease and desist letters they received.

Interestingly, per this 2006 letter, Cincinnati power lawyer Stan Chesley attempted to intervene on behalf of my brother. Two years earlier, immediately after I first started speaking out in the press, Chesley sent these two profer letters to Karen and me, both of which we ignored. More details about Chesley's involvement in the Heimlich history may be of interest to reporters; contact us for details. (Since that time, Chesley has been implicated in the massive fen-phen case, in which attorneys allegedly stole millons from their own clients.)

As reported in Cincinnati CityBeat, my brother made me a settlement offer which I rejected in lieu of an apology. I'm still waiting. As for the others, apparently they've finally stopped telling lies about me, at least in the press. (Those with an interest in journalism ethics may be surprised to learn that Janet is a freelance reporter who works for National Public Radio and the Austin Statesman-American. As for Robert Kraft, he's a one-time Scripps reporter/editor who lost his last newspaper job under murky circumstances and ended up at a Cincinnati PR shop. He was all too willing to do various dirty jobs for my father, the kind which other public relations professionals would consider unethical, such as hyping discredited medical advice which might kill children.)

Interestingly, I discovered that when it comes to being a target of my father's abusive conduct, I'm in excellent company. Throughout his career, he engaged in similar underhanded tactics, trying to ruin some of the world's leading medical experts simply because they disagreed with his conclusions. Click here for some examples.

During all these years, the only contact from my family has been a few e-mails from my sister Elisabeth and some bizarre, vaguely-threatening letters from my father. The last time we saw any of them was October 2001 in Cincinnati. Karen and I went there after learning about serious family medical problems which had been kept secret from us. My father had enabled the problems and failed to seek adequate treatment. When I confronted him, he denied everything and refused to answer questions. When we called my brother Phil and my sister Janet to enlist their help, they hung up on us.  

Ironically, my parents and my siblings are responsible for everything that followed. Their behavior was so suspicious I wanted to know what is was they were hiding! Since my family wouldn't give us any answers, we started making calls and asking questions. My father's famous, so we began pulling articles and every other document we could locate. Long story short, what started as a search for answers to questions about family issues quickly turned into an in-depth research project into my father's work.

Eventually our efforts resulted in scores of TV and print stories, exposing 50 years of medical and other frauds involving my father and others. As we learned, there's no manual for whistleblowers, especially when it comes to exposing crimes involving your own family. It was a wild five-year ride, one in which we had to stand up to the medical profession, the media, and my own family - some of whom have some explaining to do.

We finally succeeded at bringing out the truth about the frauds, but questions still need to be answered. Over the past 30 years, how many lives were lost as a result of my father's mad ideas? What responsibility for those deaths falls on his cronies, like those who engineered the fake drownings?

       
Robert Kraft                   Dan Pinger

What about the conduct of Cincinnati press agent Robert Kraft and his former boss, Dan Pinger? While Karen and I were struggling to expose the medical frauds - hoping to prevent more kids from being hurt or killed - Kraft was being paid by my father to promote his medical quackery and to suppress our efforts. For years, Kraft knowingly lied to reporters, hinting that I was "unstable" and portraying me as a kook. This slimy behavior - which violates the code of ethics established by the Public Relations Society of America of which both Kraft & Pinger are members - went on for several years. Not once did they ever tried to contact me or Karen - they just cashed the checks and did my father's dirty work while he kept his hands clean. Finally it got so bad that my attorney Louis Sirkin had to intervene. That appears to have finally muzzled them.

What's the latest? Until he threw in the towel in late January, my brother Phil was hoping to become the Republican nominee in the 2008 Ohio 2nd Congressional District. Meanwhile the leading Democrat in the same race is Dr. Victoria Wulsin. As it happens, in an unlikely twist of political fate, Dr. Wulsin used to work for the Heimlich Institute developing the Africa "Malariotherapy" project. In other words, my brother was Dr. Wulsin's boss and both participated in unethical, unsupervised, clandestine human experiments on impoverished African AIDS patients. Published information also connects the following players to the Africa experiments: Deaconess Associations of Cincinnati, the Episcopal Church, a Rotary International executive, a Denver gold mining trade group, and the wife of a senior editor at the New Republic magazine. For more, read Ohio Congressional Race Makes Strange Bedfellows.

As for my father, over the years he drifted from legitimate medicine and fell into the welcoming arms of the so-called "alternative health" community where he gives speeches to organizations like the "Northwest Naturopathic Physicians Convention" and to "anti-aging medicine" hucksters and the like. (My mother Jane Heimlich, who wrote two quack medical books, apparently steered him in that direction.)

As for the inventive and relentless media hustling through which he made his name a household word, my father now avoids any reporters who ask serious questions. But he's in good health and still gives softball interviews, such as this unusual September 14, 2007 interview on WCET, Cincinnati's public television station.

The Heimlich story keeps developing. Tips, good ideas, and thoughtful responses are always welcome. Click here to contact us - PMH

 

Back to table of contents

                      Elisabeth Heimlich @1999

When they were married in 1988, Peter Heimlich & Karen Shulman founded Global Village Imports, a wholesale textile design and import company which they continue to run. Before then, Karen founded and operated a jewelry business, and Peter was a rock & roller. (Here's a video of heavy metal hottie Lita Ford performing one of Peter's tunes.) Karen was an English major and got her BS from UMass Amherst in 1984. Peter got his BS from Syracuse University's Newhouse School of Journalism in 1977. During his college years, Peter was a freelance writer for the Cincinnati Enquirer and other papers, and won the Hearst National Journalism Award. They live in suburban Atlanta.

Thanks and good fortune to friends, known and unknown, who helped along the way.

Admiration and special thanks to Pamela Mills-Senn and the late Dr. Joseph S. Redding, who smelled a rat and weren't afraid to be the first to say so - P&K

 

 

Back to table of contents

Medical experts speak out against my father's history of misconduct

(Henry Heimlich's career) is the biggest case of scientific fraud I've ever seen. The longest, the biggest and the most far-reaching, without a doubt...His ideas are insane. Some of his ideas are delusional. He has been experimenting on human beings for most of his career, and he's no different than the Nazi experimenters. There isn't one iota of scientific basis for this except that Heimlich said so - Robert S. Baratz MD PhD DDS, National Council Against Health Fraud (Portland Tribune, April 13, 2007)

Dr. Heimlich continues to distort, misquote, fabricate, and mislead his peers and the public regarding the scientific "evidence" supporting the safety and efficacy of his (drowning) theory. Dr. Heimlich's "evidence" consists of unsubstantiated, poorly documented anecdotes. He cites letters to the editor (published in the Journal of the American Medical Association) as though they represented rigorous scientific study - Joseph P. Ornato MD, Medical College of Virginia, in an August 1992 letter to the American Red Cross (Cincinnati Enquirer, May 10, 1993)

Heimlich overpowered science all along the way with his slick tactics and intimidation, and everyone, including us at the AHA caved in - American Heart Association consultant Roger D. White MD, Mayo Clinic (Cincinnati Magazine, April 2007)

It's so repugnant to me the way Dr. Heimlich has bullied..He's a bully and he has bullied people into submission - .Charles W. Guildner MD (ret), former consultant, American Heart Association (KUOW Public Radio, 12/3/07)

 

Back to table of contents

What medical & water safety experts say about Peter & Karen's work

Your crusade is a major plus for medicine and for the American public. So, as a member of both communities, I thank you - Alan Steinman MD MPH, Rear Admiral (ret.) US Coast Guard, author, Ship's Medicine Chest and Medical Aid at Sea 2003, the Coast Guard's water safety manual

Peter Heimlich's relentless and successful effort to expose the truth has been an inspiration to lifesavers everywhere - B. Chris Brewster, President, US Lifesaving Association

Peter Heimlich has worked tirelessly to uncover a fascinating, yet little known chapter of medical history, one with as much human intrigue as you would expect from a John LeCarre novel - Charles W. Guildner MD (ret), former consultant, American Heart Association

I've been investigating medical fraud and quackery for 25 years. Peter Heimlich and his wife Karen uncovered the biggest case I've ever seen - Robert Baratz MD PhD DDS, National Council Against Health Fraud

 

Back to table of contents

                         

ABC-TV investigative reports

JUNE 8, 2007
ABC 20/20, Brian Ross reports:
Is Dr. Heimlich Really a Savior? (video)
Includes interviews with Anthony S. Fauci MD, Peter Rosen MD, Peter Heimlich, and Phil Heimlich
The Blotter (ABC News blog): Dr. Heimlich's New 'Maneuver': Cure AIDS With Malaria

Back story interview by Brian Ross with producer Joseph Rhee

JULY 18, 2007
ABC News, The Blotter: Heimlich's Son Pushes to Discredit Famous Dad by JR Santo
Dr. Henry Heimlich's name has been dropped from a prestigious humanitarian award following intense criticism of Dr. Heimlich's activities in recent years raised by his own son...A recent 20/20 investigation detailed Dr. Heimlich's attempts to promote the use of his maneuver on near drowning victims and cystic fibrosis patients, which leading medical experts say is either useless or potentially dangerous.

NOVEMBER 17, 2006
ABC Chicago, The Maneuver, by Emmy-winning investigative reporter Chuck Goudie
VIDEO TEXT
The I-Team visited the impressive-sounding Heimlich Institute, which exists to promote Heimlich and his maneuver, on the accounting floor of a Cincinnati office. We found the office, with no one in it, the phone answered by a machine.

NOVEMBER 15-16, 2005
ABC Kirksville, MO, Drowning: To Heimlich of Not?, by Zach Brown
Part I: Video - Text
"There isn't a single piece of scientific evidence that shows the Heimlich Maneuver actually worked to save the life of a drowning victim."
Part II: Video - Text The death of Angela Henley.

 


Back to main table of contents

Key news stories & documents arranged by subject

A. "Malariotherapy"

B. The use of the Heimlich maneuver for near drowning - a 30-year medical atrocity
SUMMARY

1. Medical & water safety organizations' statements warning against the Heimlich maneuver for drowning rescue
2. Key print & TV reports
3. Organizations and individuals advocating the Heimlich maneuver for drowning
4. Dubious Heimlich maneuver drowning rescue case reports
5.
Letters to my father and to Deaconess Associations requesting documentation for suspect Heimlich maneuver drowning case reports

C. Heimlich maneuver for choking frauds

D. Heimlich maneuver for asthma fraud

E. False claim of inventing esophagus replacement operation

F. Henry and Phil Heimlich's relationships with
narco doctors

G. Who is Dr. Edward A. Patrick?
    
1. Edward A. Patrick's claimed 1975-76 Jewish Hospital residency
    2. The Patrick - or Fattu - Maneuver?

H. Tall tales & fabrications

I. Prominent supporters of Dr. Henry Heimlich's work

Addenda:
    
1. Is it ethical for a press agent to circulate dangerous medical advice?
    2. Unreported & under-reported Heimlich stories

 

 

Back to Key news stories and documents arranged by subject

A."Malariotherapy"

Heimlich May Discuss Malaria Therapy for AIDS by Anita Wadhwani, Nashville Tennessean, 10/29/04
Conference Uninvites Doctor Advocating Malaria Therapy for AIDS
by Anita Wadhwani, Nashville Tennessean, 10/30/04

 

 

Back to Key news stories and documents arranged by subject

B. The use of the Heimlich maneuver for near drowning - a 30-year medical atrocity

SUMMARY
1. Medical & water safety organizations' statements warning against the Heimlich maneuver for drowning rescue
2. Key print & TV reports
3. Organizations and individuals advocating the Heimlich maneuver for drowning
4. Dubious Heimlich maneuver drowning rescue case reports
5.
Letters to my father and to Deaconess Associations requesting documentation for suspect Heimlich maneuver drowning case reports

SUMMARY: The promotion of the Heimlich maneuver as a treatment for drowning is unquestionably my father's most destructive fraud. Its use has been linked to dozens of deaths, many of them children. Due to lack of documentation, It's impossible to arrive at the actual number which may be considerably higher.

It's also, in a perverse sense, my father's most "successful" scam. He first introduced the idea in August 1974, using a "miracle case" in which a Potomac, Maryland doctor allegedly used the maneuver to bring a near-dead drowning victim back from the dead. My father and the Potomac doctor never revealed that they were longtime intimate friends. Over the next 30 years, my father and more on-the-take cronies cooked up about a dozen similar phony cases.

Meanwhile every drowning expert agrees that performing the maneuver on drowning victims is not only worthless, but may cause victims to vomit and aspirate, resulting in brain damage or death. Nevertheless, in 1985, with no evidence except for a couple dubious case reports, my father managed to bully the American Heart Association into incorporating the treatment into their drowning rescue guidelines. Later, based on zero legitimate evidence, the country's two top private lifeguard training companies, Ellis and NASCO, began teaching lifeguards at major pools and waterparks to perform the maneuver on drowning victims. (Ellis stopped in 2000; NASCO is still teaching it to lifeguards across the country.)

In other words, my father started with an idea for a useless, potentially deadly treatment. Starting in 1974 and during the next three decades, he fabricated a batch of phony cases to help sell the idea using his media access. Along the way, he managed to convince organizations and individuals to get on board. The horrifying result? Who knows how many dead kids.

Obviously the Heimlich maneuver for drowning is a macabre and disturbing chapter in medical history, all the more so because it's an atrocity engineered in plain sight by "America's most famous doctor" (as one reporter called my father). It's also a fascinating exploration into how for 30 years, one man's mad scheme was taken up and enabled by leading medical professionals and businessmen, all of whom should have known better. The evidence was always there for them to see. They chose to ignore it, either due to self-interest or in order to avoid challenging a celebrity doctor.

Thanks to our efforts, this "poison idea" which my father brought into the world is close to extinction. In days to come it is hoped that the organizations which continue to promote the Heimlich maneuver for drowning will cease to do so. It is also hoped that participants in the bogus drowning rescue cases will come forward or be identified so that they may share in the responsibility for the suffering brought to familes who lost loved ones.

 

Back to Key news stories and documents arranged by subject

  1. Medical & water safety organizations' statements on the Heimlich maneuver for drowning

 

Back to Key news stories and documents arranged by subject

2. Key print & TV reports

 

Back to Key news stories and documents arranged by subject

3. Organizations and individuals advocating the Heimlich maneuver for drowning

(NASCO) works with as many as 80 waterparks and 50 community pool facilities per season. Hunsucker counts most of the major waterparks among his clientele. (Aquatics International, February 2006)

Fighting for Air: Drowning and the Heimlich Maneuver by Todd Spivak, Houston Press, October 11, 2007 (cover story) - Most doctors say the Heimlich maneuver should not be used to save drowning victims. So why does University of Houston professor John Hunsucker continue to teach it to lifeguards?

 
click cover for more

 

Back to Key news stories and documents arranged by subject

4. Dubious Heimlich maneuver drowning rescue case reports

Have you ever been boating and happened upon a near-dead floating body? Maryland RN Denise Schmitt says she did one day on Chesapeake Bay. Schmitt claims that while pulling the lifeless body out of the drink, her husband Russell "inadvertently" performed a series of Heimlich , causing the victim to expel a considerable volume of water. She claims this resulted in the near-dead victim immediately regaining consciousness and speaking: "I saw death!"

Nurse Schmitt then describes how the victim was taken to the ICU at "the local hospital." As it happens, the hospital was Anne Arundel Medical Center, where Ms. Schmitt works, but for some reason she chose not to identify that detail in her article. Nurse Schmidt has also refused to provide the name of the attending physician on the case. Interestingly, much of her article bears a striking resemblance to articles by my father, Dr. Henry Heimlich, with whom she has been in contact.

Ms. Schmitt's dramatic tale first turned up in "Boaters Rescue Drowning Man" by Rose Spik, The Bay Times, September 1, 1999, where the victim is identified as local resident Billy Lindner, who a couple years earlier had been in an auto accident "that left him with severe nerve damage, fracturing nearly every bone in his head." What was a severely-crippled man doing floating out alone in the bay? Mr. Lindner has refused to respond to repeated inquiries. It would certainly be interesting to know what happened to the boat that brought him out there, who was operating it, and why they abandoned him. In fact, doing so might be a criminal act, one which Mr. Lindner and Ms. Schmidt could have reported to the authorities.

In any event, Ms. Schmitt says the episode "was like a well-rehearsed scene in a movie."

Here's a March 13, 2007 voice message from Ms. Schmitt to me in which she states, "I know your father is a fraud and a liar and that's why I asked to distance myself from him."

 

Back to Key news stories and documents arranged by subject

5. Letters to my father and to Deaconess Associations requesting supporting documentation for dubious Heimlich maneuver drowning case reports

Henry J. Heimlich MD, trustee
Philip M. Heimlich, vice president
Barbara Lohr, secretary
E. Anthony Woods, chairman
Jane Mary Tenhover, trustee

 

 

 

Back to Key news stories and documents arranged by subject

C. Heimlich maneuver choking frauds

  • The Yale "Anti-Backblows Study & the Dysphagia Foundation A research study which was influential in changing national choking rescue guidelines in favor of the Heimlich maneuver was clandestinely funded by Dr. Heimlich. He and the author of the study, the late Richard L. Day MD, did not disclose this fact to the 1985 American Heart Association committee at which the study was presented. Drs. Heimlich & Day also neglected to reveal to the committee that they were personal friends who had been in close touch before, during, and after the study was completed.
  • Dr. Heimlich's Secretary and the Planted "Choking Death" Letters
  • Did US Surgeon General C. Everett Koop Manipulate National First Aid Guidelines as a Buddy Favor?

September 30, 1985, Koop issues Public Health Statement advocating the Heimlich maneuver for choking over all other methods; calls backblows and chest thrusts "hazardous, even lethal."

From October 2, 1985, Heimlich Maneuver Endorsed by Christine Russell, The Washington Post:
"Dr. Koop and Dr. Heimlich are not giving the process quite the chance it deserves," responded Red Cross senior vice president Dr. Lewellys Barker. Koop said in an interview that he felt the need to act more quickly after receiving letters from Heimlich and University of Cincinnati professor Edward A. Patrick, as well as his knowledge of the value of the procedure. "I felt that I couldn't stand around and wait." Patrick, who has performed research showing that the back slap can drive a foreign object downward, complained to Koop that the "lives of many Americans are endangered as the result of Red Cross first aid instruction" and said "it is urgent that you inform the public through the media of the back slap danger."

From September 19, 1985 letter from Koop to Dr. Edward A. Patrick:
(I wanted) to inform you that I had taken some action in reference to the Heimlich maneuver versus backslapping. I issued a press release on the matter several weeks ago (a copy of which was mailed to you). There will be a discussion of the matter in my monthly column which appears in weekly newspapers throughout the country. Also, the matter will be discussed in an editorial in the next issue of Public Health Reports. I called Henry's Office, found he was in New York, but left a message.

From a December 13, 2002 letter from Koop (available to the media on request):
I was a friend of Henry Heimlich for a long time before 1985, but that had nothing to do with my taking a position....

From Maneuvering Over Heimlich by Lenore Skenazy, New York Sun, February 21, 2007:
Back blows are "death blows," Dr. Heimlich declared long and loud as he lobbied for his maneuver's acceptance 30 years ago. In 1985, Surgeon General C. Everett Koop endorsed this view, dubbing backslaps "hazardous."...Peter Heimlich (says) "Koop was an old friend of my father's, and he did it as a buddy favor."

 

 

Back to Key news stories and documents arranged by subject

D. Heimlich maneuver for asthma fraud

Loren Greenway, administrative director of respiratory and pulmonary medicine for Intermountain Health Care, and a nationally certified asthma educator, finds Heimlich’s asthma maneuver physiologically unfounded and dangerous. “Using the Heimlich maneuver in an acute asthmatic condition ... could actually kill somebody,” said Greenway, adding that asthma-treatment medications are necessary and safe in treating the underlying inflammation that causes mucous buildup, and that a Heimlich Maneuver could not possibly affect the inflammation. As to the claims made on Heimlich’s Website and elsewhere, Greenway said that “without the data to prove it, there is no more egregious kind of statement that can be made than ‘If you use this, your asthma will go away or get better.’ In my opinion, it’s tantamount to malpractice. I think it would be laughable if it was presented at an internationally renowned conference.”

"The Heimlich maneuver will stop an asthma attack," said (Dr.) Heimlich. Heimlich also urges the maneuver be used on cystic fibrosis victims, all claims that have stunned the medical community and major medical organizations, which warn that the use of the Heimlich maneuver in those situations could be fatal. The American Lung Association asked Chicago respiratory expert Dr. John Shannon to speak with us. "It shouldn't be used at all in asthma in cystic fibrosis or any chronic inflation disorder in the lung passages," said Dr. John Shannon, Stroger Cook County Hospital ."There is a good possibility of making a person with asthma substantially worse."

 

 

Back to Key news stories and documents arranged by subject

E. False claim of inventing esophagus surgery ("The Heimlich Operation")

 

 

Back to Key news stories and documents arranged by subject

F. Henry and Phil Heimlich's relationships with narco doctors

My Father & Brother's History with Narco Doctors: Gerson Carr, Ryan Krebs, and Milton Uhley Dr. Henry Heimlich & Phil Heimlich's close relationships with at least three physicians who lost their licenses for excessive prescribing of narcotics, one of whom he helped parole from prison after several patients died of overdoses while in his care. Another, Phil Heimlich's best friend, served five years in federal prison in a massive federal drug sting.

 

                                                                                                              

Back to Key news stories and documents arranged by subject


                 

Click photos for Heimlich-Patrick time line